“The court held that summary judgment must be denied where intent is disputed, Carter v. Blythe, 512 U.S. 340 (1994).”
✕ No such case exists
General AI writes fluent, persuasive law and invents the citations. Jubitus drafts only from passages it can quote back, and shows you the text.
For a filing, “probably right” is malpractice. So we built an AI that has to show its work.
“The court held that summary judgment must be denied where intent is disputed, Carter v. Blythe, 512 U.S. 340 (1994).”
✕ No such case exists
“Summary judgment must be denied where a genuine dispute of material fact remains. 1”
Span verified Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a)
“The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
Across the US, judges are sanctioning attorneys who filed cases that never existed. The clock runs from the last time it happened.
Largest single sanction: $110,204. Of the lawyers caught, 111 have drawn a formal professional sanction. Live from the AI Hallucination Cases Database, updated September 8, 2026.
Each authority opens the passage it was verified against. Where the record does not support an answer, it says so instead of writing one.
Work product · research memo · 2 verified authorities
Short answer
Likely yes. Section 197 lists the justifiable cases; section 198.5 supplies the presumption. 12
Every line comes from a passage the engine can quote back, and each marker names its authority.
Statute · canonical source text
Cal. Penal Code § 197
Homicide is justifiable when committed by any person resisting any attempt to murder, or to commit a felony, or to do some great bodily injury…
Span verifiedfound verbatim
One press puts the statute’s own words beside the claim, with the quoted span marked in the source.
Work product · research memo · 0 verified authorities
Does a seller owe a duty to disclose a defect they never knew about?
No verified authority supports this. Nothing has been drafted to fill the gap.
Closest verified matches · examined, not on point
No verified authority, no answer. It shows the closest passages it examined and drafts nothing to fill the gap.
Three steps, and you can see all three. Nothing is drafted from a passage the engine cannot quote back to you.
6 span-verified extracts
Step one
Pulls the authorities from your corpus and the record: statute, case law, and the documents on the matter.
Verifier · 3 claims checked
Step two
Each citation is checked against its source. Conflicts and gaps are surfaced, never smoothed over.
Every claim traceable
Export PDF · 2/2 reviewed
Step three
Returns a cited answer, a draft, or a review table, with every claim traceable to a line you can open and read.
Verified against source
Every citation is checked against its source. Anything it cannot prove is flagged, not smoothed over, so you can sign the filing.
9 / 10
Every release runs against a committed catalogue of day-one situations. The current build scores nine of ten.
Reverted
It was reverted rather than shipped. A score is only worth something if a bad one stops the release.
0
Nothing is drafted from a passage the engine cannot quote back. Where the record is silent, it refuses and shows what it examined.
Tell us the work your firm actually runs. We will show you the research, the draft, and the check that flags anything it cannot prove.
Self-hosted, span-verified. Output is not legal advice.
Work product · research memo · 2 verified authorities
Whether a homeowner who shoots an intruder inside the residence is protected by the justifiable-homicide provisions of the Penal Code.
Section 197 provides that homicide is justifiable when resisting an attempt to murder, to commit a felony, or to do great bodily injury. 1 Section 198.5 creates a presumption of reasonable fear of imminent peril where force is used within the residence against a person who unlawfully and forcibly entered. 2
Work product · research memo · 0 verified authorities
No sufficiently relevant verified authority was found; refusing rather than guessing. Nothing has been drafted, and no citation has been generated to fill the gap.
These are the span-verified extracts the engine examined and judged insufficient to answer the question, shown for reference only, not as an answer.